Good fit found for spg=225, but skipping early stop because only 5 structures have been explored
================================================================================ Run started: 2026-05-11 17:18:43 Input: /users/qzhu8/GitHub/TEST1/PXRD-agent/GSAS_PXRD/Hg2LiPm_225.csv ================================================================================ Per-system run log: 0510/logs/RunLog_Hg2LiPm_225.log Using deterministic pipeline execution. Phase 1 — rank 1/15: spg=225 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=381.2 ų Phase 1 — rank 2/15: spg=216 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=381.2 ų Phase 1 — rank 3/15: spg=209 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=381.2 ų Phase 1 — rank 4/15: spg=202 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=381.2 ų Phase 1 — rank 5/15: spg=196 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=381.2 ų Phase 1 — rank 6/15: spg=230 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=1078.1 ų Phase 1 — rank 7/15: spg=229 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=1078.1 ų Phase 1 — rank 8/15: spg=220 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=1078.1 ų Phase 1 — rank 9/15: spg=217 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=1078.1 ų Phase 1 — rank 10/15: spg=214 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=1078.1 ų Phase 1 — rank 11/15: spg=211 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=1078.1 ų Phase 1 — rank 12/15: spg=206 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=1078.1 ų Phase 1 — rank 13/15: spg=204 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=1078.1 ų Phase 1 — rank 14/15: spg=199 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=1078.1 ų Phase 1 — rank 15/15: spg=197 | Found 1 cell(s): vol=1078.1 ų Phase 2: ranked 2 (cell, SPG) pair(s) from 15 seed SPG candidates. Volume range: 381.2–381.2 ų | Total candidates: 2 Phase 2 strategy: globally rank every (cell, SPG) pair by a balanced score combining relative estimated trials and relative volume (trial_weight=0.65, volume_weight=0.35), then break ties by (fewer estimated trials, smaller volume, fewer candidates), then (symmetry, SG prediction rank, missing, chi2). Pair WPs SPG Volume(ų) Chi2 EstTrials Missing BalScore Dims -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 225 381.2 0.0001 0 0 0.029 7.251 2 1 216 381.2 0.0001 0 0 0.029 7.251 [Pair 1/2] vol=381.2 ų, spg=225, dims= 7.251: 1 WP choices. WP #1: spg=225, count=1148, dof=0, n_wps=3, wyckoff=[['8c'], ['4b'], ['4a']] ID 1-1: * 16 1 225 Fm-3m 9.64 8c 4b 4a , vol=381.2 ų 0.987, -2.276, 0.002, 0.000 3.267, 0.999, 0.011, 0.2, 8.6s [best-energy-ok] Metrics: Wr=3.2674, R2=0.9989, Chi2=0.0112, score=0.1892, accepted=True, E=-2.2759, dE=0.0000 Final refinement results: Wr=3.2674, R2=0.9989, Chi2=0.0112 Best structure saved to 0510/cifs/Match_Hg2LiPm_225.cif Accepted solution: spg=225, Wr=3.2674, R2=0.9989, Chi2=0.0112, score=0.1892, E=-2.2759, dE=0.0000, Good fit found for spg=225, but skipping early stop because only 1 structures have been explored [Pair 2/2] vol=381.2 ų, spg=216, dims= 7.251: 1 WP choices. WP #1: spg=216, count=2, dof=0, n_wps=4, wyckoff=[['4c', '4a'], ['4d'], ['4b']] ID 2-1: * 16 1 216 F-43m 9.64 4c 4a 4d 4b , vol=381.2 ų 0.962, -2.126, 0.012, 0.000 17.823, 0.968, 0.332, -5.7, 2.4s [Pair 1/2] vol=381.2 ų, spg=225, dims= 7.251: 1 WP choices. WP #1: spg=225, count=1148, dof=0, n_wps=3, wyckoff=[['8c'], ['4b'], ['4a']] ID 3-1: * 16 1 225 Fm-3m 9.64 8c 4b 4a , vol=381.2 ų 0.987, -2.276, 0.002, 0.000 3.267, 0.999, 0.011, 0.2, 2.0s [best-energy-ok] Metrics: Wr=3.2674, R2=0.9989, Chi2=0.0112, score=0.1892, accepted=True, E=-2.2759, dE=0.0000 Final refinement results: Wr=3.2674, R2=0.9989, Chi2=0.0112 Best structure saved to 0510/cifs/Match_Hg2LiPm_225.cif Accepted solution: spg=225, Wr=3.2674, R2=0.9989, Chi2=0.0112, score=0.1892, E=-2.2759, dE=0.0000, Good fit found for spg=225, but skipping early stop because only 3 structures have been explored [Pair 2/2] vol=381.2 ų, spg=216, dims= 7.251: 1 WP choices. WP #1: spg=216, count=2, dof=0, n_wps=4, wyckoff=[['4c', '4a'], ['4d'], ['4b']] ID 4-1: * 16 1 216 F-43m 9.64 4c 4a 4d 4b , vol=381.2 ų 0.962, -2.126, 0.012, 0.000 17.823, 0.968, 0.332, -5.7, 2.5s [Pair 1/2] vol=381.2 ų, spg=225, dims= 7.251: 1 WP choices. WP #1: spg=225, count=1148, dof=0, n_wps=3, wyckoff=[['8c'], ['4b'], ['4a']] ID 5-1: * 16 1 225 Fm-3m 9.64 8c 4b 4a , vol=381.2 ų 0.987, -2.276, 0.002, 0.000 3.267, 0.999, 0.011, 0.2, 2.4s [best-energy-ok] Metrics: Wr=3.2674, R2=0.9989, Chi2=0.0112, score=0.1892, accepted=True, E=-2.2759, dE=0.0000 Final refinement results: Wr=3.2674, R2=0.9989, Chi2=0.0112 Best structure saved to 0510/cifs/Match_Hg2LiPm_225.cif Accepted solution: spg=225, Wr=3.2674, R2=0.9989, Chi2=0.0112, score=0.1892, E=-2.2759, dE=0.0000, Good fit found for spg=225, but skipping early stop because only 5 structures have been explored [Pair 2/2] vol=381.2 ų, spg=216, dims= 7.251: 1 WP choices. WP #1: spg=216, count=2, dof=0, n_wps=4, wyckoff=[['4c', '4a'], ['4d'], ['4b']] ID 6-1: * 16 1 216 F-43m 9.64 4c 4a 4d 4b , vol=381.2 ų 0.962, -2.126, 0.012, 0.000 17.823, 0.968, 0.332, -5.7, 2.5s Timing breakdown: 1) SPG + cell inference: 0m 03.0s 2) Structure inference: 0m 53.7s Total: 0m 56.6s Best solution: spg=225, Wr=3.2674, R2=0.9989, Chi2=0.0112, score=0.1892, E=-2.2759, dE=0.0000, Return best result in spg=225. Best inferred-SG score observed: 0.1892